Dear friends, if I were to show
you some newspaper clippings regarding cases of violence against women in
different forms, you would in all probability remind me that piling up evidence
for something everyone accepts was totally unnecessary and uncalled for. As a
matter of fact, such news till recently evoked little emotional or intellectual
response, since these incidents, which I choose to describe as violent
manifestations of gender discrimination, were hardly ever considered to be
shocking, but (and also, maybe, because) they form an enormously
sizeable component of the total crimes committed. Undoubtedly, representing
such acts as contemptible and shameful in literary writings as well as in
social circles and from political podia is the need of the hour. However, one
notices that many times the spirit of these representations is more of
ascribing the violent manifestations to some quasi-mystical psycho-sexual
forces than of identifying the specific ideational patterns having a common
source in the problem of inequality and imbalance in man-woman relationship in
a socio-historical context.
One form of oppression can be traced back to the
irrational notions and discriminatory attitudes obtaining in tribal and
feudal-patriarchal societies, where the very consciousness of inequality as something
unjust is largely erased. Inequality may also be disguised or legitimised or even
sublimated, as in the case of sati, or as shown in Satyajit Ray's Devi.
Even the seemingly refined and sophisticated code of chivalry, focussing on
women's 'vulnerability' is not an antithesis to the feudal code.
The second pattern of violence emerges from the
extended application of the ethos of the market-place to man-woman
relationship. Bride-burning, dowry deaths, female foeticide and wife-beating
gain social legitimacy under the perverse logic of consumerism. Even women, as
mothers-in-law, for example, may become instruments of betrayal, having
interiorised the distortions of the consumerist ethos.
The third pattern of brutalities against women
can be understood in terms of 'ideological' displacement or transposition
operating behind gangrapes, custodial rapes, sexual crimes during communal and
other kinds of riots and atrocities committed for ethnic vendetta. Scores are
settled in such cases by heaping indignities upon women, who are regarded as no
better than 'trophies', and by making them scapegoats in combats in which they
are not directly involved.
It may be pointed out here that very often the
vestigial presence of an old pattern causes overlapping and compounding of
patterns, which may then reinforce one another. The three patterns identified
here are, in my view, more commonly operative in incidents of reported and
unreported violence against women than other possible ideational patterns one
might locate.